|
Map Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPLANATION
|
|
|
And there is an explanation of the book. This is just before
the pages of itineraries of direct roads:-
|
|
Explanation of the Plan adopted in the Arrangement of the DIRECT
ROADS FROM LONDON.
|
|
1. It will facilitate explanation, to consider each line of road
simply as a line, and the towns through which it passes so many
points.
|
|
2. Line of Route. The second and third columns of every page
contain the line of route to the ultimate point of distance as
seen on the opposite and following pages. The first column
contains the variations of route to the different points on the
line, and also the branch lines out of the great line of road.
|
|
3. Variations of Route. These will be seen fully exemplified, at
'Cheltenham' and 'Gloucester,' two leaves forward, where the
different routes to those places are shewn in juxta-position, and
distinctly referred to by means of the Capital letters enclosed
within brackets. See also 'Oxford,' page 2.
|
|
4. Branch Lines. The branch lines are referred to, on the line of
route, by means of the Italic type. For exemplification: the road
to Windsor branches from Slough on the annexed line, where a
reference is given to [A] in the first column, under which letter
is also given the route to Staines. See further, [B] p. 2, which
contains the route to Marlow, branching out of the main line
through Burnham.
|
|
5. Local Distances. The arched figures (here first introduced
into use) shew the local distances to the points d'appui
distinguished by asterisks. For instance, on the opposite page,
Salt Hill is seen to be 37 miles from Oxford, and Maidenhead
Bridge 33. By means of these figures, the intermediate distances
also are easily ascertained, as in the above instance, Salt Hill
to Maidenhead Bridge four miles. When the arch is inverted, and
placed under the figure, it implies that the distance is from the
point above. See this exemplified under 'Cheltenham,' page 4.
|
|
6. Prospective Distances. At the principal points d'appui, as
well others as those to which the local distances are computed,
the prospective distances on the line of route are also given, as
at Maidenhead, Henley, and Oxford. See also Cheltenham, Hereford,
&c. By the aid of these distances, and of the arched figures, the
distances from any point on the line may be instantly computed in
the mind. For instance, a tourist at Taplow, joining this line of
road at Maidenhead Bridge, perceives by inspection that the
distance thence to Cheltenham is 73 miles; that is to say, to
Oxford 33 as shewn in the column of local distances, and thence
to Cheltenham, the prospective distance 40. The italic type here
also distinguishes the branch lines; the route to Malvern, for
instance, branching out of this line two miles beyond Cheltenham.
The prospective distance from Oxford to Malvern is stated to be
56 miles; consequently Taplow to Malvern 89 miles.
|
|
7. Distinctions. Market Towns are distinguished by being printed
in Capital letters, and those places where Post Horses are to be
had, not being Market Towns, by small capitals, as COLNBROOK,
SALT HILL. The letters R. and L. signify right and left. The
CROSS ROADS are explained and illustrated, page 87.
|
|
Page 87
|
|
CROSS ROADS.
|
|
The Cross Road in the environs of London, as well as the direct
Roads, are many of them connected by the auxiliary lines of
communication contained in the three preceding pages; the New
Road from Hyde Park Corner (for instance), over Vauxhall Bridge,
connecting the Sussex and Kent with the Western and North-west
Roads; and the Road to Snaresbrook, on Epping Forest, the
South-west with the North-east and Norfolk Roads. The western
environs of the Metropolis communicate with the Holyhead,
Chester, Manchester, and North Roads, through Edgware, p.84.
|
|
The novel and improved Plan of the Cross Roads here adopted,
differing entirely from that of every other Road Book, will be
easily comprehended from the following brief explanation:-
|
|
1. In the arrangement of the roads, every continuous line of
route is concentred, as far as practicable, within one opening of
the book. See five leaves forward, for exemplification sake, Be
[s] 19 to 23, containing the entire line of route from Weymouth
to Chester and Liverpool, through Bristol, Hereford, and
Shrewsbury, a length of 224 miles; and again, Br [s] 35 to 40,
containing the line of route from Exeter to Sheffield, through
Bristol, Gloucester, Worcester, Birmingham, and Derby, a length
of 238 miles, with branches for Torquay, Teignmouth, and the
various watering places on the Devonshire coast.
|
|
2. Every continuous line of route, from one extreme point to
another, is distinguished by the alphabetical letters prefixed,
as by Be, Br, in the routes above re
|
|
page 88
|
|
ferred to. See also A [s] 1, on the opposite page, &c. &c. The
first and third columns of each page contain the continuous line,
and the middle column shews the branch distances to the points of
junction on that line where the roads converge. The utility of
this column will be best appreciated by considering the map of
England as a mathematical figure, and every continuous line as a
right line; in which case the branch lines become either
converging lines to, or diverging lines from, the continuous
line.
|
|
3. The continuous lines of route are subdivided into sections of
distance from one principal place to another, thus:-
|
|
[s] 1. Aberystwith to Shrewsbury;
|
|
[s] 2. Shrewsbury to Derby;
|
|
[s] 3. Derby to Lincoln;
|
|
as exemplified on the opposite and two following pages; these
sections not comprising any particular periods of distance, but
terminating at such points d'appui as best comport with facility
of reference, and convenience of arrangement.
|
|
4. The arched figures shew the distances to and from points
d'appui. Thus Montgomery, on the opposite page, is seen to be 54
miles from Aberystwith, and 22 from Shrewsbury. By means of these
figures, the computation of distances, generally, is much
facilitated: the distance from Newtown to Nottingham, for
instance, on the annexed line of route, is seen with very little
exertion of mind, to be 111 1/2 miles, thus, Newtown to
Shrewsbury 31; thence to Derby 65 1/2; and Derby to Nottingham
15.
|
|
5. The general index is so arranged, that reference may at once
be had to any required line of route, from any considerable town
or watering place. For exemplification, suppose the route from
Shrewsbury to Barmouth be required; or Barmouth to Shrewsbury.
See idex, under Shrewsbury, which directs to [s] 1 c, where, as
seen on the opposite page, the road diverges at Mallwyd to
Barmouth, through Dolgelly. On reversing the order of route, and
travelling from Barmouth to Shrewsbury, Mallwyd becomes, vice
versa, the converging point, where the branch joins the main
line.
|
|
6. Where there are two lines of route from one place to another,
they are placed, as far as practicable, in juxta-position, as on
the opposite page, where [s] 1 a shews the route from Aberystwith
to Shrewsbury, through Montgomery, and [s] 1 b that through
Welshpool.
|
|
On travelling by cross roads, it should always be borne in mind
that the best roads generally are those which lead to large
towns; and though such lines of route may be, occasionally,
somewhat circuitous, their circuity is well compensated by the
better state of the road, the facilities afforded by the more
frequent intercourse of stage coaches, the additional
recommendation of good inns, &c. &c.
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE?
|
|
It is worth noticing that the multiplicity of routes,
variations, branches, etc, is too much of a good thing.
Attempting to serve with itineraries, the needs of travellers who
must have been becoming more aware of the many ways of going from
A to B, is no longer an effective mechanism. Gray's faith in the
comprehensibility of his explanations and coding and indices is
misplaced - at least to a modern reader. Today we expect to read
and understand without having to work at it. But, we do also
expect to read be able to a map, to add marked road distances
from spot to spot, to assess likely route qualities, and to make
up our own mind. A good road map conveys the intricate
information much more effectively. If we do want a particular
itinerary we use the advice of a motoring organisation, or a
computer route finder to answer that immediate need.
|
|
|
|
list of map notes |
|
|
|
|
|